Results of surgical treatment for drug-resistant temporal epilepsy and related predictors of negative post-surgery outcome
https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2024.200
Abstract
Objective: to evaluate the results of surgical treatment and identify related predictors of unfavorable outcome in patients with temporal drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE) in long-term postoperative period.
Material and methods. Fifty-one patients with temporal lobe DRE were examined using clinical, neuroimaging, electro- physiological, and laboratory research methods from June 2020 to June 2023. Anteromedial temporal lobectomy (AMLE) and selective amygdalohippocampectomy (SAHE) were performed in 38 (74.5%) and 13 (25.5%) cases, respectively. Postsurgery outcomes were evaluated in 51 patients 6 months later, continued in 43 and 20 patients 1 year and 2 years, respectively, afterwards.
Results. The percentage of patients with significant improvement (Engel I/II) 6 months, 1 year and 2 years post-surgery was 82.4%, 72.1%, and 55.0%, respectively. After AMLE vs. SAHE, patients had a more favorable outcome while assessing seizure control. The predictors of unfavorable post-surgery outcome included a prolonged epilepsy course before surgery, the presence of electroencephalography-verified epileptiform activity in postoperative period, and repeated surgical intervention. Patient age, the presence of focal seizures evolving into bilateral tonic-clonic seizures as well as more frequent seizures before surgery were considered as potential predictors.
Conclusion. The study results show that quite high effectiveness of seizure control in postoperative period in temporal DRE is quite high that may be accounted for by probability of removing epileptogenic foci and suppression of the mechanisms ensuring emergence and irritation of epileptic discharges. Nevertheless, effectiveness of surgical treatment fades off with time, which requires to further investigate the negative factors countering long-term post-surgery effect. In connection with this, a special attention should be paid to factors such as the presence of electroencephalography-verified epileptiform activity in postoperative period, repeated surgical intervention as well as prolonged epilepsy before surgery.
About the Authors
O.A.M. Al-SahliRussian Federation
Osamah A.M. Al-Sahli
7-9 University Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034
L. M. Tibekina
Russian Federation
Lyudmila М. Tibekina, Dr. Sci. Med., Prof.
7-9 University Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034
WoS ResearcherID: G-7936-2015. Scopus Author ID: 6507271711
A. E. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Anastasia E. Ivanova
7-9 University Emb., Saint Petersburg 199034
References
1. Kalilani L., Sun X., Pelgrims B., et al. The epidemiology of drugresistant epilepsy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Epilepsia. 2018; 59 (12): 2179–93. https://doi.org/10.1111/epi.14596.
2. Löscher W., Potschka H., Sisodiya S.M., Vezzani A. Drug resistance in epilepsy: clinical impact, potential mechanisms, and new innovative treatment options. Pharmacol Rev. 2020; 72 (3): 606–38. https://doi.org/10.1124/PR.120.019539.
3. Engel J., McDermott M.P., Wiebe S., et al. Early surgical therapy for drug-resistant temporal lobe epilepsy: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2012; 307 (9): 922–30. https://doi.org/10.1001/JAMA.2012.220.
4. Engel J. Jr., Rasmussen T.B., Ojemann L.M. (Eds.) Outcome with respect to epileptic seizures. New York: Raven Press; 1993: 609–21.
5. Krylov V.V., Gekht A.B., Lebedeva A.V., et al. Surgical outcomes in patients with drugresistant bilateral temporal lobe epilepsy confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of Clinical and Experimental Neurology. 2022; 16 (4): 29–37 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.54101/ACEN.2022.4.4.
6. Petrosyan D.V., Kopachev D.N., Sharkova S.M., et al. Results of surgical treatment of patients with drug-resistant structural temporal lobe epilepsy. Nervnye bolezni / Nervous Diseases. 2021; 4: 42–7 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24412/2226-0757-2021-12375.
7. Jain P., Tomlinson G., Snead C., et al. Systematic review and network meta-analysis of resective surgery for mesial temporal lobe epilepsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2018; 89 (11): 1138–44. https://doi.org/10.1136/JNNP-2017-317783.
8. Xu K., Wang X., Guan Y., et al. Comparisons of the seizure-free outcome and visual field deficits between anterior temporal lobectomy and selective amygdalohippocampectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Seizure. 2020; 81: 228–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seizure.2020.07.024.
9. Josephson C.B., Dykeman J., Fiest K.M., et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of standard vs selective temporal lobe epilepsy surgery. Neurology. 2013; 80 (18): 1669–76. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0B013E3182904F82.
10. Rathore C., Jeyaraj M.K., Dash G.K., et al. Outcome after seizure recurrence on antiepileptic drug withdrawal following temporal lobectomy. Neurology. 2018; 91 (3): e208–16. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000005820.
11. Wendling A.S., Hirsch E., Wisniewski I., et al. Selective amygdalohippocampectomy versus standard temporal lobectomy in patients with mesial temporal lobe epilepsy and unilateral hippocampal sclerosis. Epilepsy Res. 2013; 104 (1–2): 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eplepsyres.2012.09.007.
12. Kasumov V.R. Early and late results of surgical treatment of multifocal epilepsy. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2009; 8 (1 (2)): 42–5 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.20538/1682-0363-2009-1(2)-42-45.
13. Areshkina I.G., Sapronova M.R., Schnaider N.A., et al. Outcomes of epilepsy surgery. Doctor.Ru. 2020; 19 (4): 29–34 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31550/1727-2378-2020-19-4-29-34.
14. Al-Sahli U.A., Spiricheva E.V., Samsonov D.V. Outcomes of different methods of surgical treatment in patients with drug-resistant epilepsy. In: Sarana А.М. (Ed.) Fundamental Science and Clinical Medicine – Man and His health: Proceedings of the XXVI International Biomedical Conference of Young Researchers. Saint Petersburg: Scientia; 2023: 593–4 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.32415/scientia_978-5-6049390-4-8.
15. Krylov V.V., Guekht A.B., Trifonov I.S., et al. Outcomes of surgical treatment of patients with pharmacoresistant epilepsy. S.S. Korsakov Journal of Neurology and Psychiatry. 2016; 116 (9-2): 13–8 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17116/jnevro20161169213-18.
16. Odintsova G.V., Aleksandrov M.V., Ulitin A.U., et al. Unsatisfactory results of a drug resistant epilepsy surgical treatment: reasons analysis and treatment optimization way. Translational Medicine. 2018; 5 (4): 60–8 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18705/2311-4495-2018-5-4-60-68.
17. Schwartz T.H., Jeha L., Tanner A., et al. Late seizures in patients initially seizure free after epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2006; 47 (3): 567–73. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1528-1167.2006.00469.x.
18. de Tisi J., Bell G.S., Peacock J.L., et al. The long-term outcome of adult epilepsy surgery, patterns of seizure remission, and relapse: a cohort study. Lancet. 2011; 378 (9800): 1388–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60890-8.
19. Bien C.G., Raabe A.L., Schramm J., et al. Trends in presurgical evaluation and surgical treatment of epilepsy at one centre from 1988– 2009. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013; 84 (1): 54–61. https://doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2011-301763.
20. McIntosh A.M., Averill C.A., Kalnins R.M., et al. Long-term seizure outcome and risk factors for recurrence after extratemporal epilepsy surgery. Epilepsia. 2012; 53 (6): 970–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.15281167.2012.03430.x.
21. McIntosh A.M., Kalnins R.M., Mitchell L.A., et al. Temporal lobectomy: long-term seizure outcome, late recurrence and risks for seizure recurrence. Brain. 2004; 127 (Pt 9): 2018–30. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/awh221.
Review
For citations:
Al-Sahli O., Tibekina L.M., Ivanova A.E. Results of surgical treatment for drug-resistant temporal epilepsy and related predictors of negative post-surgery outcome. Epilepsy and paroxysmal conditions. 2024;16(3):202–211. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2024.200

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.