Algorithm for the provision of comprehensive psychotherapeutic support to women experiencing neuropsychiatric symptoms during rehabilitation following the treatment of malignant neoplasms of the reproductive system

Background. Radical treatment of malignant neoplasms (MNs) of female reproductive system often has serious consequences. Chronic pain syndrome, distress, anxiety and depression, decreased self-esteem, sexual dysfunction and social maladjustment reduce quality of life (QoL) and require psychotherapeutic support.
Objective: to create an algorithm for the provision of comprehensive psychotherapeutic support during rehabilitation following the treatment of reproductive system MNs and to evaluate its effect on QoL indicators in women with neuropsychiatric disorders.
Material and methods. The algorithm for the provision of comprehensive psychotherapeutic support included clinical interview, cognitive behavioral therapy, visualization, audio therapy, art therapy, group and individual psychotherapy, family psychotherapy, image therapy. The QoL indicators were determined by questionnaires using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – General (FACT-G) with nosology-specific extensions (subscales of physical well-being, social/family well-being, emotional wellbeing and functional well-being), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Kupperman–Uvarova Modified Menopausal Index (MMI). The follow-up period was 1 year after radical surgical treatment of reproductive system MNs in different localizations. The main group received the algorithm for the provision of comprehensive psychotherapeutic support as part of active medical rehabilitation, the comparison group received basic rehabilitation.
Results. The study included 47 women with vulvar cancer (VC): active rehabilitation group (VC-1) – 24 patients and basic rehabilitation group (VC-2) – 23 patients; 61 women with endometrial cancer (EC): active rehabilitation group (EC-1) – 29 patients and basic rehabilitation group (EC-2) – 32 patients; 103 women with cervical cancer (CC): active rehabilitation group (CC-1) – 51 patients and basic rehabilitation group (CC-2) – 52 patients; 62 women with stages I–II ovarian cancer (OC) and low malignant potential tumor (LMPT): active rehabilitation group (LMPT-1) – 29 patients and basic rehabilitation group (LMPT-2) – 33 patients. Differences in physical, social/family and functional well-being (FACT-G) were significant from the 6th month and in emotional well-being – by the end of follow-up. Neurovegetative and psycho-emotional disorders, as assessed by Kupperman–Uvarova MMI, showed significant positive dynamics in women who received the algorithm for the provision of comprehensive psychotherapeutic support, in contrast to the comparison group, where these indicators remained without significant dynamics or worsened by the end of the follow-up period. The HADS scores during psychotherapeutic support decreased to normal values at the 6–12th months of follow-up, while those who received the basic rehabilitation continued to have subclinical anxiety and depression.
Conclusion. The developed algorithm for psychotherapeutic support as part of active medical rehabilitation of women who underwent radical treatment for reproductive system MNs (VC, EC, CC, OC, and LMPT) has demonstrated its effectiveness, justifuing its implementation in clinical practice.

1. Franasiak J.M., Scott R.T. Demographics of cancer in the reproductive age female. In: Sabanegh E. Jr. (Ed.) Cancer and fertility (current clinical urology book 0) 1st ed. Humana Press; 2016: 602 pp. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27711-0_2.

2. Lortet-Tieulent J., Ferlay J., Bray F., Jemal A. International patterns and trends in endometrial cancer incidence, 1978–2013. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013; 110 (4): 354–61. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/djx214.

3. Fazel A., Hasanpour-Heidari S., Salamat F., et al. Marked increase in breast cancer incidence in young women: a 10-year study from Northern Iran, 2004–2013. Cancer Epidemiol. 2019; 62: 101573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.canep.2019.101573.

4. Blinov D.V., Solopova А.G., Achkasov Е.Е., et al. Medical rehabilitation of patients with menopausal syndrome and surgical menopause: contribution of magnesium deficiency correction. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2022; 15 (4): 478–90 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.159.

5. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., Vlasina A.Yu., Akavova S.A., Galkin V.N., Petrenko D.A., Bykovshchenko G.К. Strengthening rehabilitation for patients with ovarian tumors: current approaches and future directions. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2023; 16 (2): 303–16 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2023.196.

6. Allebeck P., Bolund C., Ringbäck G. Increased suicide rate in cancer patients. A cohort study based on the Swedish Cancer–Environment Register. J Clin Epidemiol. 1989; 42 (7): 611–6. https://doi. org/10.1016/0895-4356(89)90003-6.

7. Chronic pain syndrome (CBS) in adult patients in need of palliative care. Clinical guidelines. 2023. Available at: https://cr.minzdrav.gov.ru/ recomend/400_2 (in Russ.) (accessed 10.08.2023).

8. Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., Begovich E., et al. Neurological disorders after hysterectomy: from pathogenesis to clinical manifestations. Epilepsia i paroksizmalʹnye sostoania / Epilepsy and Paroxysmal Conditions. 2022; 14 (1): 54–64 (in Russ.). https://doi. org/10.17749/2077-8333/epi.par.con.2022.115.

9. Habib A.S., Kertai M.D., Cooter M., et al. Risk factors for severe acute pain and persistent pain after surgery for breast cancer: a prospective observational study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019; 44 (2): 192–9. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2018-000040.

10. Wang L., Cohen J.C., Devasenapathy N., et al. Prevalence and intensity of persistent post-surgical pain following breast cancer surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observationalstudies. Br J Anaesth. 2020; 125 (3): 346–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. bja.2020.04.088.

11. Sabulei C., Maree J.E. An exploration into the quality of life of women treated for cervical cancer. Curationis. 2019; 42 (1): 1982. https://doi.org/10.4102/curationis.v42i1.1982.

12. Brown M.R., Ramirez J.D., Farquhar-Smith P. Pain in cancer survivors. Br J Pain. 2014; 8 (4): 139–53. https://doi. org/10.1177/2049463714542605.

13. Gałecki J., Hicer-Grzenkowicz J., Grudzień-Kowalska M., et al. Radiation-induced brachial plexopathy and hypofractionated regimens in adjuvant irradiation of patients with breast cancer – a review. Acta Oncol. 2006; 45 (3): 280–4. https://doi. org/10.1080/02841860500371907.

14. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Plutnitskiy A.N., et al. Strengthening health care to provide rehabilitation services for women with cancer diseases of the reproductive system. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2022; 15 (1): 119–30 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.132.

15. Sandzhieva L.N., Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., et al. Personalized comprehensive rehabilitation program after surgical treatment of endometrial cancer: results of a prospective randomized comparative study. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2022; 16 (2): 143–57 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2022.318.

16. Sandzhieva L.N., Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., et al. Comparatively analyzed quality of life in patients with atypical endometrial hyperplasia and endometrial cancer during various rehabilitation activities. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2022; 16 (4): 410–25 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn. rep.2022.344.

17. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Sandzhieva L.N., et al. Strengthening medical rehabilitation services in health system: a situation analysis. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2022; 15 (2): 237–49 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2070-4909/ farmakoekonomika.2022.140.

18. Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., Demyanov S.V., et al. Epigenetic aspects in rehabilitation of female cancer patients. FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Sovremennaya farmakoekonomika i farmakoepidemiologiya / FARMAKOEKONOMIKA. Modern Pharmacoeconomics and Pharmacoepidemiology. 2022; 15 (2): 294–303 (in Russ.). https://doi. org/10.17749/2070-4909/farmakoekonomika.2022.141.

19. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., et al. Dynamics of quality of life indicators in rehabilitation after surgical treatment of female reproductive system tumors of various localization. Oncogynecology. 2023; 2: 56–68 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.52313/22278710_2023_ 2_56.

20. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., et al. Rehabilitation effectiveness after radical surgical treatment of endometrial cancer. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023; 17 (1): 33–43 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.392.

21. Blinov D.V., Solopova A.G., Achkasov E.E., et al. Contemporary insights into rehabilitation of cervical cancer patients. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2023; 17 (3): 343–56 (in Russ.). https://doi. org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2023.426.

22. Solopova A.G., Blinov D.V., Achkasov E.E., et al. Methods of assessing the quality of life in women with malignant neoplasms of the reproductive system. Vrach / The Doctor. 2023; 34 (1): 10–9 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2023-01-02.

23. Solopova A.G., Vlasina A.Yu., Son E.A., et al. Adjuvant therapy of surgical menopause symptoms in rehabilitation of patients with borderline ovarian tumors: a role of “cancer immunotherapy diet”. Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproduction. 2020; 14 (3): 296–313 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17749/2313-7347/ob.gyn.rep.2020.146.

24. Vlasina A.Yu., Solopova A.G., Ivanova E.A. Anticancer diet, or principles of rational nutrition in gynecological cancer patients during rehabilitation. Vrach / The Doctor. 2020; 31 (4): 3–7 (in Russ.). https://doi.org/10.29296/25877305-2020-04-01.

25. Umamaheswaran S., Dasari S.K., Yang P., et al. Stress, inflammation, and eicosanoids: an emerging perspective. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2018; 37 (2-3): 203–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10555-018-9741-1.

26. Chida Y., Hamer M., Wardle J., Steptoe A. Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival? Nat Clin Pract Oncol. 2008; 5 (8): 466–75. https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncponc1134.

27. Zalivin A.A., Naboka M.V., Volosnikova E.S. Psychological and psychotherapeutical aspects of recovery in oncological patients. Omskiy psikhiatricheskiy zhurnal / Omsk Psychiatric Journal. 2019; 3: 36–40 (in Russ.).

28. Cherrier M.M., Anderson K., David D., et al. A randomized trial of cognitive rehabilitation in cancer survivors. Life Sci. 2013; 93 (17): 617–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2013.08.011.

29. Schuurs A., Green H.J. A feasibility study of group cognitive rehabilitation for cancer survivors: enhancing cognitive function and quality of life. Psychooncology. 2013; 22 (5): 1043–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3102.

30. Ercoli L.M., Petersen L., Hunter A.M., et al. Cognitive rehabilitation group intervention for breast cancer survivors: results of a randomized clinical trial. Psychojncology. 2015; 24 (11): 1360–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3769.

31. Simonton O.K., Creighton J., Simonton Mattheus S. Getting well again. Bantam: Reissue edition; 1992: 304 pp.

32. Gnezdilov A.V. Psychology and psychotherapy of losses. Saint Petersburg: Rech; 2002: 162 pp. (in Russ.).

33. Huss E., Samson T. Drawing on the arts to enhance salutogenic coping with health-related stress and loss. Front Psychol. 2018; 9: 1612. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01612.

34. Kopytin A.I. Theory and practice of art therapy. Saint Petersburg: Piter; 2002: 366 pp. (in Russ.).

35. Czamanski-Cohen J., Wiley J.F., Sela N., et al. The role of emotional processing in art therapy (REPAT) for breast cancer patients. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2019: 37 (5): 586–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/07347332.2019.1590491.

36. Wiswell S., Bell J.G., McHale J., et al. The effect of art therapy on the quality of life in patients with a gynecologic cancer receiving chemotherapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2019; 152 (2): 334–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.11.026.

37. Bozcuk H., Ozcan K., Erdogan C., et al. A comparative study of art therapy in cancer patients receiving chemotherapy and improvement in quality of life by watercolor painting. Complement Ther Med. 2017; 30: 67–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2016.11.006.

38. Koom W.S., Choi M.Y., Lee J., et al. Art therapy using famous painting appreciation maintains fatigue levels during radiotherapy in cancer patients. Radiat Oncol J. 2016; 34 (2): 135–44. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2016.01760.

39. Ando M., Hayashida S. Psychological utility of art therapy for patients with advanced cancer. Clin Case Rep Rev. 2017; 3 (7): 1–4. https://doi.org/10.15761/CCRR.1000354.

40. LaPenna D., Tariman J.D. Art therapy: a literature review of efficacy in improving psychosomatic symptoms in patients with cancer. Clin J Oncol Nurs. 2020; 24 (2): 123–6. https://doi.org/10.1188/20.CJON.123-126.

41. Reuter K., Scholl I., Sillem M., et al. Implementation and benefits of psychooncological group interventions in German breast centers: a pilot study on supportive-expressive group therapy for women with primary breast cancer. Breast Care (Basel). 2010; 5 (2): 91–6. https://doi.org/10.1159/000297739.

42. Febrina F., Triyoga I.F., White M., et al. Efficacy of interventions to manage sexual dysfunction in women with cancer: a systematic review. Menopause. 2022; 29 (5): 609–26. https://doi.org/10.1097/GME.0000000000001953.

43. Streb J., Jabłoński M.J., Słowik A., et al. Indications for sexology consultation in women after surgical treatment due to breast cancer. Ann Agric Environ Med. 2019; 26 (2): 379–84. https://doi.org/10.26444/aaem/89733.

44. Del Pup L., Villa P., Amar I.D., et al. Approach to sexual dysfunction in women with cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2019; 29 (3): 630–4. http://doi.org/10.1136/ijgc-2018-000096.

45. Forbat L. The role and value of family therapy for people living with cancer: a rapid review of recent evidence. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2020; 14 (3): 263–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/SPC.0000000000000504.

46. Zinkevich-Evstigneeva T.D., Grabenko T.M., Gnezdilov A.V. The practice of image therapy. Saint Petersburg: Rech; 2006 (in Russ.).

47. Maki P.M., Kornstein S.G., Joffe H., et al. Guidelines for the evaluation and treatment of perimenopausal depression: summary and recommendations. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2019; 28 (2): 117–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/jwh.2018.27099.mensocrec.

48. Cronin C., Hungerford C., Wilson R.L. Using digital health technologies to manage the psychosocial symptoms of menopause in the workplace: a narrative literature review. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2021; 42 (6): 541–8. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1827101.

49. Cuijpers P., Riper H., Andersson G. Internet-based treatment of depression. Curr Opin Psychol. 2015; 4: 131–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2014.12.026.

50. Tsivyan B.L. Opinion of patients on the use of restorative and sanatorium treatment methods for benign neoplasms of female genital organs. Eurasian Union of Scientists. 2015; 4-8: 22–3 (in Russ.).

51. Grushina T.I. Physiotherapy in the rehabilitation of cancer patients. Journal of N.N. Blokhin Russian Cancer Research Center RAMS. 2003; 14 (2): 31–5 (in Russ.).

52. Kukshina A.A., Vereshchagina D.A. Peculiarities of the psychoemotional state and psychotherapeutic methods in rehabilitation of oncological patients. Russian Journal of Physiotherapy, Balneology and Rehabilitation. 2013; 5: 28–34 (in Russ.)